Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

N. Curtiss PETITJEAN, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Watson ARCENEAUX et al., Defendants and Appellants.

CULPEPPER, Judge.

ON MOTION TO REMAND

Plaintiff appellee filed a motion to remand this case to enable him to traverse the affidavits of poverty filed by defendants-appellants in support of their motion to prosecute this appeal in forma pauperis. Our jurisprudence is now established that plaintiff appellee is entitled to the remand which he seeks. See Affiliated Foods, Inc. v. Blanchard, 256 So.2d 363 (3rd Cir. 1971) and the authorities cited therein.

For the reasons assigned, this case is remanded to the district court for the purpose of allowing plaintiff-appellee to traverse the affidavits of poverty on the basis of which appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis.

Remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PETITJEAN v. ARCENEAUX
(Sep 19, 1972)