AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MARILYN FLEISIG, Respondent, v. ROBERT FLEISIG, Appellant.

In an action for divorce, the defendant husband appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 6, 1972, as, on plaintiff's motion, awarded her alimony and child support and further directed defendant to pay the carrying charges, fuel and utility bills, exclusive of telephone service, on the parties' marital residence, pendente lite. Order modified by reducing the award for respondent's support from $225 to $100 per week (Domestic Relations Law, §§ 236, 240). As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the award was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Any seeming inequity in a temporary order for alimony and child support is to be remedied by a speedy trial where the rights of the parties can be finally determined ( Bogut v. Bogut, 38 A.D.2d 829; Tobias v. Tobias, 36 A.D.2d 643; Lebovics v. Lebovics, 34 A.D.2d 783). Rabin, P.J., Hopkins, Munder, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FLEISIG v. FLEISIG
(Sep 25, 1972)