Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WHITUS v. CALDWELL.

MOBLEY, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from the dismissal of the petition of appellant seeking writ of habeas corpus. The appellant filed application for writ of habeas corpus which contained petition for leave to file and proceed in forma pauperis, alleging that: "Because of his poverty he is unable to pay the costs and fees or to give bond in lieu thereof."

The respondent filed a traverse of the appellant's affidavit of poverty, under the provisions of Code Ann. § 24-3413. The trial court, after hearing evidence, sustained the traverse and dismissed the petition.

The evidence showed that the appellant had $74.11 on deposit with the State prison and that there was no restriction on his withdrawing his money. Thus the court properly found that the appellant was not relieved of the necessity of paying the $20 costs, as he failed to show, as required by Code Ann. § 24-3413, "that from poverty he is unable to pay these costs."

The court dismissed the petition "without prejudice to Phil Whitus to refile a petition for writ of habeas corpus together with the necessary deposit required by Georgia law if, at the time of refiling, petitioner Whitus is able to pay such deposit." The court properly dismissed the petition.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

MOBLEY, Chief Justice.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 12, 1972 — DECIDED OCTOBER 6, 1972.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WHITUS v. CALDWELL
(Oct 6, 1972)