Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BUTLER v. THE STATE.

PER CURIAM.

The application for supersedeas is based upon the overruling of a motion for change of venue. The trial judge denied the supersedeas on October 16, 1972, and the defendant filed a notice of appeal on the same date from the judgment denying the motion for change of venue. No certificate of immediate review has been granted. The overruling of the motion for change of venue is an interlocutory order which is not an appealable judgment absent a certificate of review. Code § 27-1202, as amended (Ga. L. 1972, pp. 536, 537); Brooks v. State, 229 Ga. 593; McCurley v. State, 126 Ga. App. 335 ( 190 S.E.2d 631); Rucker v. State, 124 Ga. App. 491 ( 184 S.E.2d 228).

It is ordered that the application for supersedeas be hereby denied.

Supersedeas denied. Bell, C. J., Hall, P. J., and Eberhardt, P. J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 20, 1972.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BUTLER v. STATE
(Oct 20, 1972)