Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

Gilbert Olgen SALAZAR et al., Appellants, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee. Terrance Wilson TURNEY et al., Appellants,

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

These are appeals from judgments forfeiting bail bonds.

The parties to these causes through a joint motion, pray that they be reversed and remanded for the purpose of entering a compromise settlement.

Bond forfeiture appeals are governed by 'the same rules that govern civil actions where an appeal is taken or a writ of error sued out'. Article 44.44, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.; Reeves v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 465 S.W.2d 757.

A judgment of reversal will be entered when parties to a civil cause on appeal, through a joint motion, request that the cause be reversed for the purpose of entering an agreed judgment. Butler v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 481 S.W.2d 907, and the cases cited therein.

The judgments are reversed and the causes remanded to the 167th District Court of Travis County, and the clerk is directed to issue mandates immediately upon the announcement of this decision.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SALAZAR v. STATE
(Oct 25, 1972)