STATE v. DRAUGHN, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Edward Weisslitz, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for the appellant ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney.) Mr. Michael Stieber, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. David Noah Dubrow, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief.)

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Edward Weisslitz, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for the appellant ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney.) Mr. Michael Stieber, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Joseph P. Lordi, Essex County Prosecutor, attorney; Mr. David Noah Dubrow, Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief.)

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROBERT DRAUGHN,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division, 121 N.J. Super. 64 is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in its opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices JACOBS, HALL and MOUNTAIN, and Judge CONFORD — 5.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.