Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WEINGRAD v. AMERCO MARKETING COMPANY.

BELL, Chief Judge.

In this action on account plaintiff's exhibits which established the account and the amount due and owing by defendant were admitted over objection. This documentary evidence purports to emanate from Arcoa, Inc. The president of the plaintiff corporation testified by way of foundation for the admission of this evidence that Arcoa, Inc. is a subsidiary which performs the accounting and bookkeeping function for the plaintiff. This evidence under this showing was relevant and admissible and authorized the trial judge, hearing the case without a jury, to find for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed. Evans and Stolz, JJ., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 6, 1972 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 9, 1972.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WEINGRAD v. AMERCO MARKETING COMPANY
(Nov 9, 1972)