AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION v. DAN AUSTIN PROPERTIES, INC. et al.

HAWES, Justice.

Georgia-Pacific Corporation filed a claim of lien as a supplier of materials against Dan Austin Properties, Inc., et al., and sought to foreclose it. The trial court denied relief and Georgia-Pacific Corporation appealed to the Court of Appeals which affirmed the judgment of the trial court. See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Dan Austin Properties, 126 Ga. App. 191 ( 190 S.E.2d 131). We granted certiorari. Upon further careful consideration of the issues presented by the appeal, we have concluded that the opinion of the Court of Appeals correctly states the law and applies the same to the facts of this case. It would serve no useful purpose for this court to reiterate the ruling of the Court of Appeals, and, accordingly, we affirm the judgment without further opinion.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 13, 1972 — DECIDED DECEMBER 4, 1972.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION v. DAN AUSTIN PROPERTIES
(Dec 4, 1972)