Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Francis J. Dixon, a member of the New York bar, filed a brief pro se. Mr. Robert A. Pennachio filed a brief for respondent ( Messrs. Draesel, Breitenstein Pennachio, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. Francis J. Dixon, a member of the New York bar, filed a brief pro se. Mr. Robert A. Pennachio filed a brief for respondent ( Messrs. Draesel, Breitenstein Pennachio, attorneys).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

CAROL J. DIXON, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. FRANCIS J. DIXON,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

There being no appeal as of right in this matter and the Court having considered the filed papers as a petition for certification, the Court will dismiss this matter as presenting no substantial issue.

For dismissal — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices JACOBS, HALL and MOUNTAIN, and Judges CONFORD, SULLIVAN and LEWIS — 7.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

DIXON v. DIXON
(Dec 4, 1972)