AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

ANTHONY DI TOMMASO, Respondent, v. BROOKHATTAN UTILITIES, INC., et al., Appellants, and JOHN PERZ, as Administratrix of the Estate of RITA PERZ, Deceased, Defendant. (Action No. 1.) (And Three Other Actions.)

Three judgments of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, one in each of the first three above-entitled actions, entered March 30, 1972, March 29, 1972 and April 3, 1972, respectively, affirmed, with one bill of costs, jointly to respondents appearing separately in said actions, and jointly against appellants therein. In the fourth above-entitled action, judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, entered April 24, 1972, affirmed, without costs. The refusal of the trial court to charge the jury that the State trooper was a disinterested witness was harmless error. Munder, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Shapiro, Gulotta and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DI TOMMASO v. BROOKHATTAN UTILITIES, INC
(Dec 11, 1972)