ODOM, Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of receiving and concealing stolen property of the value of over $50.00. Punishment was assessed by the court at ten years.
This case was tried on the same date as Glover v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 486 S.W.2d 783 (This day decided.) The same ground of error is urged in this case, i.e., the evidence in insufficient to support the plea of guilty.
The exact same procedure was followed herein as was in Glover v. State, supra, and herein we also hold that the judicial confession is sufficient to support the plea of guilty. See Glover v. State, supra, and cases cited therein.
It is noted in the instant case that the judgment and sentence entered, through an obvious clerical error, show the appellant as having been found guilty of the offense of felony theft instead of the offense of receiving and concealing stolen property of the value of over $50.00 of which he was found guilty in this case. Therefore, the judgment and sentence are ordered reformed and corrected to show the offense as receiving and concealing corporeal personal property of the value of over $50.00, knowing the same to have been stolen.
As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.