DESSEL v. DESSEL, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Richard F. Plechner argued the cause for the appellants ( Mr. Robert G. Hampson, on the brief). Mr. Roger H. McGlynn argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. McGlynn, Stein Eberiel, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM:

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Richard F. Plechner argued the cause for the appellants ( Mr. Robert G. Hampson, on the brief). Mr. Roger H. McGlynn argued the cause for the respondents ( Messrs. McGlynn, Stein Eberiel, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM:

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

LEONARD M. DESSEL AND ARLENE B. BOGEN, EXECUTORS UNDER THE LAST WILL ANDTESTAMENT OF JOSEPH DESSEL, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JULIUSDESSEL, BENJAMIN DESSEL AND METUCHEN FOOD MARKET, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEWJERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM:

The Appellate Division's judgment of reversal and remand is affirmed, essentially for the reasons set forth in its per curiam reported at 122 N.J. Super. 119 (1972).

For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, HALL and MOUNTAIN, and Judges CONFORD, SULLIVAN and LEWIS — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

DESSEL v. DESSEL

LEONARD M. DESSEL AND ARLENE B. BOGEN, EXECUTORS UNDER THE LAST WILL ANDTESTAMENT OF JOSEPH DESSEL, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JULIUSDESSEL, BENJAMIN DESSEL AND METUCHEN FOOD MARKET, INC., A CORPORATION OF NEWJERSEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Comments