Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GUY LAVERN KUEHN v. STATE OF ARKANSAS

CRIMINAL LAW — CRUEL UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT — REDUCTION OF PENALTY. — Appellant's conviction of first degree murder affirmed but the punishment reduced from death to life imprisonment as being the next highest available penalty in view of U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Furman v. Georgia, and in accordance with Ark. Stat. Ann. 43-2308 (Repl. 1964).

FRANK HOLT, Justice.

A jury convicted appellant of first degree murder and assessed his punishment at death by electrocution. On appeal the only contention is that the judgment on this verdict constitutes cruel and unusual punishment as forbidden by the United States Constitution and, consequently, his sentence must be reduced to life imprisonment. This contention is valid. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), Graham v. State, 253 Ark. 462, 486 S.W.2d 675 (1972), and O'Neal v. State, 253 Ark. 574, 487 S.W.2d 618.

The cause is remanded to the trial court for sentencing to life imprisonment which is the next highest available remedy. Ark. Stat. Ann. 43-2308 (Repl. 1964).

Affirmed as modified and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KUEHN v. STATE
(Jan 29, 1973)