AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

DANIEL LEONARD et al., Respondents, v. WALTER DAVENPORT SONS, INC., Defendant-Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff. MOBIL OIL CORPORATION et al., Third-Party Defendants.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on March 29, 1972, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and appellant's motion to amend its answer is granted, without costs and without disbursements, on condition that appellant pay the sum of $250 in costs, within 20 days of service upon it by respondents of a copy of the order entered hereon, and serves its amended answer within that same period. This action was commenced September 29, 1969, and issue joined February 6, 1970. Appellant asserts that it only learned of the availability of the Statute of Limitations as a possible defense in or about May, 1970. Appellant states no valid reason for the delay in moving to amend its answer and for that reason additional costs are imposed. Moreover, it is the policy of the law that leave to amend shall be freely granted upon such terms as may be just (CPLR 3025, subd. [b]). The amended complaint merely alleged that the causes of action accrued prior to August 17, 1968. In that posture of the pleadings and the causes of action set forth, no prejudice to plaintiffs is shown for if the proposed amendment has validity, there are no measures which plaintiffs could have taken to avoid its effect.

Concur — Stevens, P.J., McGivern, Markewich, Murphy and Tilzer, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LEONARD v. WALTER DAVENPORT SONS, INC
(Jan 25, 1973)