Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. LOUIS DAN SMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21. The evidence was sufficient to warrant the conviction of appellant on an indictment charging the robbery of a bank. Title 18, U.S.C.A., § 2113(a), (d). There was no error in the charge on the inference of guilt which might be drawn by the jury from possession by appellant of some of the money taken from the bank. Wilson v. United States, 1896, 162 U.S. 613, 619-620, 16 S.Ct. 895, 40 L.Ed. 1090; Thurmond v. United States, 5 Cir., 1967, 377 F.2d 448, 451.

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. SMITH
(Feb 21, 1973)