Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

VIRLEE OSBORNE, APPELLANT, v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPT. OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, RESPONDENT.

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant's sole contention on appeal is that the record does not support a decision of the Board of Review, Employment Security Department, the effect of which was to deny him unemployment benefits in the sum of $599. In our view, said decision is supported by substantial evidence, which warranted a determination that twice within a two week period, in order to obtain unreduced benefits, appellant falsely stated he had been totally unemployed.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

OSBORNE v. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPTARTMENT
(Mar 6, 1973)