Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

KANSAS CITY, RESPONDENT, v. MARIA L. GARZA, APPELLANT.

WASSERSTROM, Judge.

Defendant appeals from a judgment finding her guilty of a violation of the City's traffic ordinances. Her brief sets out the following points: (1) A police officer who failed to appear and testify in municipal court may not be permitted to testify in circuit court on appeal; (2) An information based upon a Missouri Uniform Traffic Ticket may not be amended without leave of court; and (3) An information based upon a Missouri Uniform Traffic Ticket may not be amended without notice to the defendant.

These purported points are purely abstract statements of law and present nothing for review. Rule 84.04(d), V.A.M.R.; Boyd v. Boyd, 459 S.W.2d 8, l.c. 12 (Mo.App. 1970); Epperson v. Nolan, 452 S.W.2d 263, l.c. 267-268 (Mo.App. 1970); Scarato v. Hayward, 446 S.W.2d 135, l.c. 136-137 (Mo.App. 1969).

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

All concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KANSAS CITY v. GARZA
(Apr 2, 1973)