MASON, ET AL. v. CITY OF PATERSON, ET AL, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Adolph A. Romei argued the cause for defendants-appellants City of Paterson, et al. Mr. Dennis J. Cummins, Jr., argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents Mason, et al. Mr. Leonard S. Miller argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents and cross-appellants ( Messrs. Miller and Reenstra, attorneys). Mr. Charles H. Roemer argued the cause for respondents Board of Commissioners of Assessment of Taxes, etc.

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

WILLIAM MASON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OF PATERSON, ETAL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, ETC., ET AL.,PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,

PER CURIAM.

The trial court held, among other things, that the statute establishing the form of government for the City of Paterson was unconstitutional. 120 N.J. Super. 184 (Law Div. 1972). On motion, we certified the appeals prior to consideration in the Appellate Division.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by the trial court. There is reserved to the trial court authority to amend the timetable in paragraphs 6, 7 and 8 of the judgment if circumstances shall so warrant.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justices JACOBS, PROCTOR, HALL, MOUNTAIN and SULLIVAN and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

MASON, ET AL. v. CITY OF PATERSON, ET AL

WILLIAM MASON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OF PATERSON, ETAL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF PATERSON, ETC., ET AL.,PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS,

Comments