Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FRANK KNIGHT, PETITIONER, v. NORMAN EDWARDS, RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner was aggrieved by an interlocutory decision in a civil action such as was formally cognizable in equity and brought his petition for writ of certiorari under Rule 4.5(c), Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A. Petitioner misconceived his appellate remedy, the proper answer being an interlocutory appeal, under Rule 4.2, Florida Appellate Rules. We are not permitted to transpose and treat his petition as an appeal. Bartow Growers Processing Corp. v. Florida Growers Processing Cooperative, Fla. 1954, 71 So.2d 165; Schneider v. Manheimer, Fla.App. 1964, 170 So.2d 75. Sapp v. La Violette, Fla.App. 1970, 242 So.2d 483. See generally Florida Civil Practice After Trial, § 17.17, et seq.

Dismissed.

REED, C.J., and WALDEN and MAGER, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KNIGHT v. EDWARDS
(Apr 25, 1973)