Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM C. BRADLEY v. RILEY C. LEMOINE.

TUCKER, Judge.

The plaintiff, William C. Bradley, brought this suit to recover the balance of an attorney's fee in the sum of $764.20 allegedly due him for representing the defendant, Riley C. Lemoine, in proceedings designed to result in a separation from bed and board from his wife. The trial court rejected the plaintiff's suit on the merits, and from this judgment the plaintiff has appealed. After the case was heard on the merits the defendant filed an exception of no right of action directed to the proposition that the plaintiff was a member of a partnership engaged in the practice of law, composed of him and Paul T. Thompson. The defendant on appeal reurges the legal efficacy of this exception. The evidence adduced at the trial clearly shows that such attorney's fee, if any, was an indebtedness due the partnership of Bradley Thompson.

This suit is brought individually by the plaintiff and not in the name of the partnership. A partnership is a separate and distinct entity from its individual members, and under the provisions of LSA-C.C.P. Art. 688 a suit seeking recovery of an indebtedness due the partnership must be brought in the name of the partnership, and not in the name of an individual member thereof. See also 21 La.Law Rev. 29.

The exception of no right of action will be maintained, and for this reason the judgment of the trial court, dismissing plaintiff's suit will be affirmed at his costs.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRADLEY v. LEMOINE
(May 14, 1973)