AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of MANSFIELD CONTRACTING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. JOHN V. LINDSAY et al., Indi

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 22, 1973, dismissing the petition in this article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus and vacating the preliminary injunction, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. In affirming, we have noted the opinion on a related matter of Judge Whitman Knapp in the U.S. Court for the Southern District of New York. (See N.Y.L.J., May 4, 1973, p. 5, col. 5.) It would seem that to relegate the petitioner-appellant to an action at law is injurious to the taxpayers in that the city does not receive the benefit of the lowest bid and may, in addition, be held in damages. However, we seem foreclosed by the decision in People ex rel. Lunney v. Campbell ( 72 N.Y. 496). (See, also, Lynch v. Mayor, 2 App. Div. 213; Beckwith v. City of New York, 121 App. Div. 462.)

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Kupferman, Lane, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF MANSFIELD CONTR. CORP. v. LINDSAY
(May 22, 1973)