Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent v. LOCAL 365 CEMETERY WORKERS GREEN ATTENDANTS BUILDING SERVICE UNION-EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL AFL-CIO et al., Appellants.

Order affirmed, without costs. Question certified answered in the affirmative. Defendant-appellant's arguments concerning deprivation of due process and discriminatory action are refuted by our decisions in Mount St. Mary's Hosp. v. Catherwood ( 26 N.Y.2d 493, mot. for rearg. den. 27 N.Y.2d 737) and People v. Ditniak ( 28 N.Y.2d 74). Neither is there improper delegation of legislative power ( Chiropractic Assn. of N.Y. v. Hilleboe, 12 N.Y.2d 109; Matter of City of Utica v. Water Pollution Control Bd., 5 N.Y.2d 164; Paterson v. University of State of N.Y., 14 N.Y.2d 432). There was ample evidence at Special Term of an emergency situation so that the application of the subject statute in this case cannot be deemed arbitrary.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, BREITEL, JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. LOCAL 365 CEMETERY WORKERS
(Jul 3, 1973)