Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF INDIANA v. MARIE DEPREZ ET AL.

EMINENT DOMAIN — Procedure. — Where the State had paid to the Clerk of Court the amount of damages assessed in a condemnation action and that amount had been paid to the condemnees who disclaimed any right, title or interest in the condemned land, the interest and title to the condemned land passed to the State by statute and the State was not entitled to have the Court's ruling modified on the ground that the ruling, which dismissed the State's appeal, left the State without title to the condemned land.

ON REHEARING

ARTERBURN, C.J.

The State of Indiana filed exceptions to appraiser's report in a condemnation action for highway purposes. After some delays, the trial court dismissed the proceedings on the exceptions to the appraiser's report from which the State appealed. On the 21st day of May, 1973, we sustained a motion to dismiss the appeal by the State, See 296 N.E.2d 120. The State has now filed a Petition to Modify Ruling dismissing the appeal with our court claiming that it leaves the State without title to the land condemned.

We find the State has paid to the Clerk of the Court the amount of damages assessed and that has been paid to the landowners. In accordance with the statute the interest and title condemned would pass to the State. The appellees' Response to Appellant's Petition to Modify Ruling herein states that they "disclaim any right, title or interest in or to the interest so condemned by the State of Indiana" to the land and real estate in question. We find that the State does hold the interest sought to be condemned in the real estate; accordingly, the petition to modify ruling is denied.

NOTE. — Reported in 300 N.E.2d 341.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. DEPREX ET AL
(Aug 20, 1973)