Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

DANIEL ALEXANDER MANESS, JR. v. RONALD CLYDE BULLINS AND CLYDE COLUMBUS BULLINS

HEDRICK, Judge.

In this civil action plaintiff, Daniel Alexander Maness, Jr., father, seeks to recover from the defendants medical expenses incurred in the treatment of injuries allegedly sustained by his minor son, Larry Edward Maness, as a result of an automobile accident on 4 June 1966.

Our decision, filed simultaneously herewith, in the cases of Larry Edward Maness v. Ronald Clyde Bullins and Clyde Columbus Bullins and Daniel Alexander Maness, Jr., v. Ronald Clyde Bullins and Clyde Columbus Bullins, ordering a new trial on all issues, renders moot the questions raised on this appeal.

New trial.

Chief Judge BROCK and Judge BALEY concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MANESS v. BULLINS
(Sep 1, 1973)