Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LUTHER B. JACKSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TERRY HENSLEY ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM:

It is hereby ordered that the above styled and numbered appeal be dismissed for want of prosecution in view of the appellant's failure to file a brief within the time fixed by the rules. Rule 9(b). See Tidwell v. Dees, 5th Cir. 1972, 464 F.2d 1297.

It is appropriate to dispose of this pro se case summarily, pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 9(c)(2), appellant having failed to file a brief within the time fixed by Rule 31, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Kimbrough v. Beto, Director, 5th Cir. 1969, 412 F.2d 981.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JACKSON v. HENSLEY
(Sep 7, 1973)