Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

SINNOTT v NOBLE

PER CURIAM.

ORDER.

The issues upon which leave to appeal in this matter was heretofore granted having been thoroughly examined, and briefs and arguments thereon considered, it is the opinion of the Court that leave to appeal was improvidently granted.

The only meritorious issue raised by appellant was the correctness of the charge to the jury. It is not properly before us at this time, no objection having been made by appellant at trial, GCR 1963, 516, and the issue not having been framed by appellant in his brief, GCR 1963, 854; 813. For additional reasons and discussion see 30 L Ed 2d 829, 847-854.

Accordingly, the Court does not pass on the correctness of the instructions given, and neither approves nor disapproves them.

T.M. KAVANAGH, C.J., and T.E. BRENNAN, T.G. KAVANAGH, SWAINSON, WILLIAMS, and M.S. COLEMAN, JJ., concurred.

LEVIN, J., did not sit in this case.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SINNOTT v. NOBLE
(Sep 18, 1973)