Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EADY v. THE STATE.

STOLZ, Judge.

The defendant appeals from his conviction of the offense of aggravated assault. Held:

1. The trial judge did not err in overruling the defendant's motion for continuance based upon the absence of a material witness for whom a subpoena was not issued by the defendant until the morning the trial was to begin and who had not been served therewith at the time the motion was made. See Code Ann. § 81-1410 (Ga. L. 1959, p. 342); Code § 27-2002; Code Ann. § 38-801 (a, c, e, f) (Ga. L. 1966, p. 502; 1968, pp. 434, 435; 1968, p. 1200).

2. There was no error in allowing a witness for the state, a detective major of the Griffin Police Department, to remain in the courtroom to assist in the prosecution of the case after testifying. Fountain v. State, 228 Ga. 306 (3) ( 185 S.E.2d 62) and cits.

3. Enumerated errors 7 and 8 are without merit.

4. The trial judge did not err in overruling the defendant's amended motion for new trial.

Judgment affirmed. Eberhardt, P. J., and Pannell, J., concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 4, 1973 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 17, 1973.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EADY v. STATE
(Sep 17, 1973)