Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF LOUISIANA, APPELLEE, v. SHELLY BATISTE, APPELLANT.

TATE, Justice.

The defendant was convicted of aggravated battery, La.R.S. 14:34, and sentenced to serve four years in the penitentiary.

On appeal, his counsel argues two bills of exceptions which were reserved during the trial. La.C.Cr.P. Art. 841. However, these bills were not perfected as required by La.C.Cr.P. Arts. 844, 845, and thus do not constitute formal bills of exceptions. On review, the appellate court can consider only formal bills of exceptions. La.C.Cr.P. Arts. 844, 920. If there are none, the reviewing court can reverse only for error discoverable "by a mere inspection of the pleadings and proceedings and without inspection of the evidence". La.C.Cr.P. Art. 920(2). We find no such patent error here.

We therefore affirm the conviction and sentence.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. BATISTE
(Sep 24, 1973)