Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. JOHNNIE ANDERSON, JR., AND MARY KNOWLES ANDERSON, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM:

We affirm the conviction of these two defendants on various counts of knowing and intentional possession of heroin with intent to distribute.

(1) The flower bed outside the house was part of the residence described in the search warrant as 1209 Avenue Q, Apartment B, this being a duplex house with its own grounds and dissimilar to the hotel, store and apartment houses in the cases upon which appellants rely.

(2) Defendants were properly joined under Rule 8(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Denial of a motion for severance was not an abuse of the discretion reposed in the trial court in such matters.

(3) Any possible error concerning the unobjected to, volunteered hearsay testimony was rendered harmless beyond a reasonable doubt in view of the total evidence produced at trial.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON
(Oct 10, 1973)