Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

IRA BRAVIN, Respondent, v. FASHION WEEK, INC., Appellant

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff has been granted summary judgment for severance pay. Where an employee is justifiably discharged for a material breach of his employment agreement, he is not entitled to severance pay ( Vogel v. Pathe Exch., 234 App. Div. 313, 318). The conflicting affidavits and documentation submitted below present a triable issue as to whether plaintiff's discharge for misconduct, disobedience and insubordination was, in fact, justified. By retaining the plaintiff in its employ after obtaining knowledge of the latter's claimed breaches of duty, the defendant did not condone the offenses as a matter of law, since the offenses are claimed to have been committed from time to time up until plaintiff's actual discharge ( Gray v. Shepard, 147 N.Y. 177, 183, 184).

The order and judgment should be modified by reversing so much thereof as granted plaintiff partial summary judgment in the amount of $6,250, with interest and costs, and, as modified, affirmed with $10 costs.

Concur — MARKOWITZ, P.J., FINE and FRANK, JJ.

Order and judgment modified, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BRAVIN v. FASHION WEEK
(Oct 10, 1973)