DWYER v. SKYLINE APTS., INC, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Martin J. Loftus, argued the cause for appellant ( Loftus, Schauer and Cuozzi, attorneys). Mr. Herbert C. Klein, argued the cause for respondent ( Kreiger and Klein, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Martin J. Loftus, argued the cause for appellant ( Loftus, Schauer and Cuozzi, attorneys). Mr. Herbert C. Klein, argued the cause for respondent ( Kreiger and Klein, attorneys).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

JOSEPHINE DWYER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SKYLINE APARTMENTS, INC.,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Dwyer v. Skyline Apartments, Inc., reported at 123 N.J. Super. 48. (App.Div. 197 3).

For affirmance — Chief Justice GARVEN and Justices JACOBS, HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 6.

Opposed — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

DWYER v. SKYLINE APTS., INC

JOSEPHINE DWYER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SKYLINE APARTMENTS, INC.,DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Comments