Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

EARLY LOWE, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF ALABAMA, RESPONDENT-APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner's pro se applications for a certificate of probable cause, and for leave to appeal in forma pauperis are granted, and the appeal is docketed.

This state prisoner's habeas petition alleges a number of constitutional defects in his arrest, indictment, trial and conviction the nature of which are such that examination of the state trial record, examination of the record of the evidentiary hearing in petitioner's state habeas action, or an evidentiary hearing in the District Court would be appropriate. See Smith v. Beto, 467 F.2d 1374, 1375 (CA5 1972); Gerzin v. Beto, 459 F.2d 671 (CA5 1972). As best we can determine, however, the District Court did not hold an evidentiary hearing and had before it neither the state trial court record nor the state evidentiary hearing record. If so that court did not conduct the requisite independent inquiry into petitioner's constitutional claims. See Townsend v. Sain, 1963, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770.

Petitioner's application for appointment of counsel on appeal is denied.

The order of the District Court denying appellant's habeas petition is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration.

It is appropriate to dispose of this case summarily. See Groendyke Transportation, Inc. v. Davis, 5 Cir., 1969, 406 F.2d 1158.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LOWE v. STATE OF ALABAMA
(Nov 13, 1973)