Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

James Jay KAPLAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.

PER CURIAM:

The Supreme Court of the United States vacated the judgment this court had entered in this case on May 10, 1971, in an opinion reported at 277 A.2d 477, which had affirmed appellant's conviction for presenting an obscene film in a "peep-show" machine, and remanded the case for our further consideration in light of its recent decisions dealing with obscenity. See ___ U.S. ___, 93 S.Ct. 3030, 37 L.Ed.2d 1022 (1973).

After reviewing the record and briefs filed at the time of the argument and considering the supplemental memoranda we permitted the parties to file after the Supreme Court's mandate to us and the decisions cited in such mandate we reinstate our judgment affirming appellant's conviction for violation of D.C. Code 1973, § 22-2001 and reaffirm our prior opinion.

So ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KAPLAN v. UNITED STATES
(Nov 21, 1973)