Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILLIAM BATES III ET AL. v. HUGH WHITTLE

PER CURIAM.

The question on this appeal involves issues of fact, and the judgment was a result reasonably reached on a permissible view of the evidence. Anderson v. D'Addario, 158 Conn. 616, 262 A.2d 187.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BATES v. WHITTLE
(Nov 14, 1973)