Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Hall, Appellant, v. Power et al.

OPINION PER CURIAM, November 26, 1973:

The order of the Commonwealth Court is affirmed.

Mr. Justice ROBERTS, Mr. Justice NIX, and Mr. Justice MANDERINO dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinions in Sweigard v. Department of Transportation, 454 Pa. 32, 35, 38, 309 A.2d 374, 376, 377 (1973); Brown v. Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566, 577, 579, 580, 305 A.2d 868, 871, 874, 875 (1973); Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 454 Pa. 179, 187, 301 A.2d 849, 853 (1973); and Thomas v. Baird, 433 Pa. 482, 485, 252 A.2d 653, 655 (1969).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HALL v. POWER ET AL
(Nov 26, 1973)