Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

HERMAN A. KAMP, Appellant, v. TIFFANY KNITS, INC., Respondent

MEMORANDUM.

Orders reversed, without costs, and plaintiff's motion granted.

Plaintiff is entitled over the adverse party's objection to conduct an examination before trial with the aid of a tape recorder ( Catapano v. Shapiro, 6 A.D.2d 1054). However, due to the present state of technological development in regard to possible tampering, we impose the following conditions and restrictions on its use:

(1) The testimony must be transcribed and submitted to the witness within 30 days and then corrected, approved and executed by him.

(2) Upon trial, the recording disc or tape may not be produced, used or offered in evidence.

(3) Only the signed examination before trial may be used at the trial.

(4) Defendant may simultaneously record the testimony on a device of his own choice.

MARGETT, P.J., and SCHWARTZWALD, J., concur; RINALDI, J., taking no part.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KAMP v. TIFFANY KNITS
(Dec 12, 1973)