MANCO v. TOWN OF IRVINGTON, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Peter A. Buchsbaum argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Herman W. Kurtz, Assistant Town Attorney argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. Samuel J. Zucker, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Peter A. Buchsbaum argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Herman W. Kurtz, Assistant Town Attorney argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. Samuel J. Zucker, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

DONALD MANCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWN OF IRVINGTON AND SAL DI COSTANZO,FIRE CHIEF AND DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF FIRE, TOWN OF IRVINGTON,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Manco v. Town of Irvington, reported at 126 N.J. Super. 148. (App.Div. 1973)

For affirmance — Acting Chief Justice JACOBS, Justices HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judges CONFORD and COLLESTER — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

MANCO v. TOWN OF IRVINGTON

DONALD MANCO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. TOWN OF IRVINGTON AND SAL DI COSTANZO,FIRE CHIEF AND DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF FIRE, TOWN OF IRVINGTON,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Comments