STATE v. FLINT, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Mart Vaarsi, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant, ( Mr. Michael R. Perle, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney). Mr. Harold Goldman argued the cause for defendant Flint, ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney). Mr. James K. Smith, Jr., Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for defendant Jackson ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney, Mr. Lloyd N. Simon, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the brief). Mr. William E. Norris, Assistant Deputy Public Defender argue the cause for defendant Jenkins ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Mart Vaarsi, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant, ( Mr. Michael R. Perle, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel and on the brief; Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney). Mr. Harold Goldman argued the cause for defendant Flint, ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney). Mr. James K. Smith, Jr., Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for defendant Jackson ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney, Mr. Lloyd N. Simon, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel and on the brief). Mr. William E. Norris, Assistant Deputy Public Defender argue the cause for defendant Jenkins ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DERRICK FLINT, BARRY STEVENSJACKSON, AND CLEMENTINE JENKINS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. State v. Flint et al., reported at 126 N.J. Super. 182 (App.Div. 1973).

For affirmance — Acting Chief Justice JACOBS, Justices HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge COLLESTER — 6.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

STATE v. FLINT

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DERRICK FLINT, BARRY STEVENSJACKSON, AND CLEMENTINE JENKINS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Comments