BATTLE CREEK GOLF COURSE v. OLCC, Or. Ct. App., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

J. Ray Rhoten, Salem, argued the cause for
With him on the briefs were Rhoten, Rhoten Speerstra
Keith J. Bauer,
Al J. Laue, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for
With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General,
W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General,

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

J. Ray Rhoten, Salem, argued the cause for
With him on the briefs were Rhoten, Rhoten Speerstra
Keith J. Bauer,
Al J. Laue, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for
With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Attorney General,
W. Michael Gillette, Solicitor General,

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

BATTLE CREEK GOLF COURSE, INC. ET AL, Petitioner, v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

This is an appeal of a denial by the Oregon Liquor Control Commission of an application for a Class A dispenser's license. ORS 472.110 (2). Although this case involves an application for such a license (liquor by the drink) rather than a package store license, it is governed by the same considerations as Sun Ray Dairy v. OLCC, 16 Or. App. 63, 517 P.2d 289 (1973). Accordingly, we remand for reconsideration in light of that opinion.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

BATTLE CREEK GOLF COURSE v. OLCC

BATTLE CREEK GOLF COURSE, INC. ET AL, Petitioner, v. OREGON LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION, Respondent.

Comments