Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, William Wachter, Stephen C. Yohay, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Guy Farmer, John A. McGuinn, Patterson, Belknap, Farmer Shibley, Washington, D.C., and Robert M. Rybolt, James K. Brooker, Day, Ketterer, Raley, Wright Rybolt, Canton, Ohio, on brief, for intervenor. Irwin Geller, New York City, for respondents; Donald F. Menagh, New York City, on brief; Clement J. Lewis, Dayton, Ohio, of counsel.
Judges
  • Paul Charles Weick
  • Anthony Joseph Celebrezze
  • John Weld Peck
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
  • Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, William Wachter, Stephen C. Yohay, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Guy Farmer, John A. McGuinn, Patterson, Belknap, Farmer Shibley, Washington, D.C., and Robert M. Rybolt, James K. Brooker, Day, Ketterer, Raley, Wright Rybolt, Canton, Ohio, on brief, for intervenor. Irwin Geller, New York City, for respondents; Donald F. Menagh, New York City, on brief; Clement J. Lewis, Dayton, Ohio, of counsel.
Judges
  • Paul Charles Weick
  • Anthony Joseph Celebrezze
  • John Weld Peck
See more information ...
Smart Summary

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER, v. UTILITY WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, ET AL., RESPONDENT.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court upon the petition of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order finding Respondents guilty of violation of Section 8(b)(3) of the National Labor Relations Act. The Board's Decision and Order, issued on April 25, 1973, is reported at 203 NLRB No. 55. We are satisfied that the Order of the Board is supported by substantial evidence on the record.

Now, therefore, it is ordered that the Order of the Board be, and it is, hereby enforced.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BD. v. UTILITY WKRS
(Feb 7, 1974)