Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of IRIS R., a Person Alleged To Be In Need of Supervision, Appellant. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the petition dismissed, without costs to either party.

In this case the determination of the fact-finding hearing utilized as its basis the preponderance of evidence standard. The Corporation Counsel, with commendable candor, points out that this court has said, "proof beyond a reasonable doubt is constitutionally required for an adjudication that a minor is a person in need of supervision (see, In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358)" ( Matter of Richard S., 27 N.Y.2d 802). Counsel observes this would seem to require reversal. We agree.

In light of the disposition herein made we deem it unnecessary to reach the other issues raised by appellant.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF IRIS R
(Feb 14, 1974)