Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Attorney(S) Mr. Robert H. Otten argued the cause for the appellant ( Crowell Otten, attorneys Mr. David W. Clark on the ) Mr. Lawrence A. Carton, III argued the cause for the respondent ( Pillsbury, Barnacle, Russell Carton, attorneys Mr. John G. Colannino on the ) See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. SHELL OIL COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OFTHE BOROUGH OF SHREWSBURY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. PER CURIAM. The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Kolovsky, reported at 127 N.J. Super. 60, 62 (1974). For reversal — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justice JACOBS, HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 7. For affirmance — None.