Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CLARK v. THE STATE.

EBERHARDT, Presiding Judge.

In this appeal from conviction of three counts of simple battery (Criminal Code § 26-1304), where each count of the accusation provides that "the date alleged herein is an essential averment to this transaction," the only issue in dispute is whether the batteries alleged in Counts 2 and 3 occurred on the dates specified therein. The evidence shows without dispute that the Count 3 battery occurred on April 21, 1973, as alleged, but that the Count 2 battery occurred after midnight of April 20, 1973, the date alleged in Count 2. Accordingly the judgment and sentence entered as to Count 2 must be reversed and vacated, and the judgment and sentence as to Counts 1 and 3 affirmed.

Judgment affirmed in part; reversed in part. Pannell and Evans, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 7, 1974 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 25, 1974.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CLARK v. STATE
(Feb 25, 1974)