AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOAN V. HUDSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

MILLER, Judge.

This case was consolidated for trial and appeal purposes with Hudson v. State of Louisiana, 289 So.2d 503 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1974) [ # 4407]. The factual and legal issues are identical.

The parties do not seek to amend the amount awarded by the trial court. It would serve no purpose to name the third party intervenor and set forth the various awards.

For the reasons assigned in the cited case, the trial court judgment is affirmed. Costs of court are taxed to appellant as allowed by LSA-R.S. 13:4521.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HUDSON v. STATE, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
(Feb 25, 1974)