Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MIZE v. QUESTOR CORPORATION.

EBERHARDT, Presiding Judge.

1. Since no constitutional attack was made below, or if made none was ruled upon by the trial court with reference to a portion or portions of the Workmen's Compensation Act which are complained of, the attack made on this appeal, for that reason, cannot be considered, and this court has jurisdiction of the appeal. Wiggins v. City of Macon, 224 Ga. 603 ( 163 S.E.2d 747).

2. Under the rulings made as to alleged negligence of the insurance carrier in making or in failing to make inspections of the working premises in Mull v. Aetna Cas. Surety Co., 120 Ga. App. 791 ( 172 S.E.2d 147); Mull v. Aetna Cas. Surety Co., 226 Ga. 462 ( 175 S.E.2d 552); as to exclusion by the Act of common law remedies against the employer — even as to alleged wilful misconduct — in Southern Wire Iron, Inc. v. Fowler, 217 Ga. 727 ( 124 S.E.2d 738); as to a spouse's lack of a claim or right of action for loss of consortium in Gulf States Ceramic v. Fenster, 228 Ga. 400 ( 185 S.E.2d 801); and as to alleged wilful misconduct and wanton disregard by the employer of dangerous conditions existing in Yancey v. Green, 129 Ga. App. 705 ( 201 S.E.2d 162), which are dispositive of all issues properly before us for review, the judgments complained of are affirmed.

Judgment affirmed. Pannell and Evans, JJ., concur.

ARGUED FEBRUARY 6, 1974 — DECIDED FEBRUARY 25, 1974 — REHEARING DENIED MARCH 18, 1974 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MIZE v. QUESTOR CORPORATION
(Feb 25, 1974)