Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

MONTE GENE MOORE, Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE PENITENTIARY, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Like Bonney v. OSP, 16 Or. App. 509, 519 P.2d 383 (1974), this is a prison discipline review proceeding. In Bonney we upheld the prison discipline procedures against statutory and constitutional challenge. This disposes of the major issues raised in this case.

It is, however, here conceded that the record does not establish that prison officials followed all requirements of those rules. The elementary proposition that an agency of government must follow its own rules requires no citation of authority.

Specifically, the record does not disclose that the prison officials advised the petitioner that under Rules IV (2) and IV (4) he had the right under certain circumstances to representation and the right to submit questions to be posed by the disciplinary committee to the person charging, or other persons.

Reversed and remanded.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MOORE v. OSP
(Mar 4, 1974)