ROSSNAGLE v. CAPRA AND SHELL OIL CO, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Leigh E. Buggeln argued the cause for respondent Bob Capra ( Messrs. Lawrie, Jennings, and Buggeln, attorneys). Mr. Joseph D. Haggerty argued the cause for respondent Barry Rossnagle.

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Verling C. Enteman argued the cause for appellant. Mr. Leigh E. Buggeln argued the cause for respondent Bob Capra ( Messrs. Lawrie, Jennings, and Buggeln, attorneys). Mr. Joseph D. Haggerty argued the cause for respondent Barry Rossnagle.

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

BARRY ROSSNAGLE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. BOB CAPRA, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT,AND SHELL OIL COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.BARRY ROSSNAGLE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Matthews filed below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices JACOBS, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.