AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PHILLIP GOFF, APPELLANT, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, DETROIT DIESEL ALLISON DIVISION, ET AL., APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

The court, sua sponte, notes that the appellant is attempting to prosecute an interlocutory appeal from an order dismissing one of two counts of a complaint directed toward the appellee named above in an action formerly cognizable at law. FAR 4.2, 32 F.S.A., does not permit an interlocutory appeal from such an order.

The court will treat the appeal as a petition for certiorari. Alliance for Conservation of Nat. Resources v. Furen, Fla.App. 2d 1958, 104 So.2d 803. However, the grounds urged by appellant are not such as to persuade the court to issue this extraordinary writ. See Stein v. Bayfront Medical Center, Inc., Fla.App.2d 1974, 287 So.2d 401. The appellant's right to review upon these grounds must await final judgment.

The petition for certiorari is denied.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and McNULTY and GRIMES, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOFF v. GEN. MOTORS CORP., DETROIT
(Apr 3, 1974)