Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PEOPLE v RITCHIE

R.B. BURNS, P.J.

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny. MCLA 750.110; MSA 28.305.

A review of the record discloses no reversible error. We affirm.

During oral argument, defense counsel raised the issue that the trial judge, during his instructions, had informed the jury that the lesser included offense of entering without permission (MCLA 750.115; MSA 28.310) was a misdemeanor.

The writer of this opinion also authored People v Nichols, 50 Mich. App. 440; 213 N.W.2d 558 (1973), and in that case held such an instruction was error. But an incorrect decision was made in Nichols. In People v Burk, 238 Mich. 485; 213 N.W. 717 (1927), the Supreme Court upheld the trial court's practice of reading the statute to the jury. Statutes state whether the crime is a felony or a misdemeanor.

Affirmed.

All concurred.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RITCHIE
(Mar 28, 1974)