D.H.M. INDUSTRIES v. CENTRAL PORT WAREHOUSE, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Burton T. Cohen, argued the cause for appellant ( Walter Henry Jones, attorney). Mr. David J. Goldberg, argued the cause for respondent D.H.M. Industries, Inc. ( Messrs. Warren, Goldberg Berman, attorneys).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Burton T. Cohen, argued the cause for appellant ( Walter Henry Jones, attorney). Mr. David J. Goldberg, argued the cause for respondent D.H.M. Industries, Inc. ( Messrs. Warren, Goldberg Berman, attorneys).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

D.H.M. INDUSTRIES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. CENTRAL PORT WAREHOUSES, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND CORBIN-BAYREALTY CORP., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-THIRD PARTYPLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, D.H. OVERMYER, CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION,AND D.H. OVERMYER CO., INC., AN OHIO CORPORATION, THIRD PARTYDEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority's per curiam opinion.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.